The Statuary of Dolonnuur, Inner Mongolia, and Its Impact across the Tibetan Buddhist World
Isabelle Charleaux
Vajrapani
Dolonnuur, Inner Mongoliamid-18th century
Vajrapani; Efi (efü?) khalkha süme, Shiliin Gol League (formerly in Chakhar), Inner Mongolia; mid-18th century; gilt-copper alloy with lacquer and pigments, inset with gems; height 73 in. (185.4 cm); Stockholm Ethnographical Museum (Folkens Museum Etnografiska); 1935.50.1714; photograph by John B. Taylor
Summary
Historian Isabelle Charleux examines a near life-sized statue created in the famous Dolonnuur metal workshop. This wrathful deity is believed to be the special protector of Mongolia and the Mongolian main incarnate lama his emanation. Dolonnuur was an important monastic town in Inner Mongolia under the Qing Empire. Its artisans used repoussé (hammered metal) and lost-wax techniques to create large scale sculptures, some over a story tall, and shipped them in parts on camels to Beijing, Lhasa, and even Russia.
In Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism, a dharmapala is a wrathful deity who is bound to protect the Buddhist teachings and its followers. Many dharmapalas were originally non-Buddhist deities, who were adopted into the Buddhist pantheon as fierce or wrathful protectors, for instance Bektse or Mahakala. There are many dramatic stories of forced conversion, or pacification of local gods by powerful masters, such as Padmasabhava who were assimilated to become protectors.
Gilding is a metalworking technique in which a fine golden surface is applied over a statue made of bronze. In Newar metalworking workshops, gilding is typically done with fire and mercury, which gives sculptures a warm finish (but is poisonous for their makers). In Tibetan contexts sometimes gold dust is mixed with glue and applied with a brush (often called “cold gold”), especially to a deity’s face to gain merit.
The Jibzundambas (from the Tibetan Jetsun dampa “venerable/reverend noble one”) were the most important lineage of tulkus in Khalkha Mongolia from 1639 to 1924, considered below only the Dalai Lamas and Panchen Lamas in prestige within the Geluk tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. While the Jibzundamba lineage traces its previous incarnations back to the Tibetan polymath and traveler Taranatha (1575–1634), the first formally enthroned Jibzundampa was the Mongolian prince and artist Zanabazar (1635–1723). As the Jibzundampa’s authority grew, their mobile monastery, called “the great encampment” (Mgl: yekhe khüriye), would gradually settle and develop into Mongolia’s modern capital, Ulaanbaatar. The eighth Jibzundamba ruled as khan of Mongolia from 1911 to 1924.
The Khalkha are one of the major historical subgroupings of the Mongols. Historically ruled by leaders descended from Chinggis Khan, the Khalkha inhabited a territory roughly the same as the country called Mongolia today. Other important Mongol groups after the fall of the Mongol Empire include the Chahars, who lived in what is today the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in China, the Oirat or Dzungars, who lived in Central Asia, and the Khoshut, who lived in the northern Tibetan Plateau.
The lost-wax technique is a metal casting method used in many Asian cultures. First, the sculptor shapes an image out of beeswax. Then layers of clay are applied to the wax model, from fine to coarse, creating a mold, usually in several parts. When the clay mold is heated, the clay hardens and the wax is drained out. The metalworker then pours molten metal into the empty space of the mold through the same channels the wax was poured out. When the metal has cooled and hardened, the clay mold is broken off, revealing the rough metal statue inside. This statue is often then polished, chiseled, combined with parts that were cast separately, gilded, inlaid with precious substances, and painted.
Repoussé is a metal-working technique in which an artisan hammers the back side of a sheet of metal, indenting it outward to create an image in relief on the reverse face.
, the “Vajra Holder,” is a martial deriving from , the Indian god of thunder. While he is portrayed in a peaceful appearance in , Tibetan Buddhists usually depict him in his form.
This statue, nearly six feet (two meters) high, presents mighty Vajrapani in the warriorposture (alidha) on a lotus seat. He crushes a snake under each foot, symbolizing obstacles he overcomes. His head has flamelike eyebrows, three bulging eyes, and a curled beard. His open mouth with red lips shows his fangs. His hair flows upward like flames, decorated with a half (thunderbolt). In his stretched right hand, Vajrapani holds a vajra scepter to enforce religious and state laws, and to tame and forcefully convert demons and heretics; with his left hand,hemakes a threatening gesture (karana).
Vajrapani wears some of the attributes of protective deities (), such as the long snake necklace and the tiger-skin loincloth, but the macabre attributes of other dharmapalas are replaced by bodhisattva’s ornaments: the five-leaf crown representing the , earrings, armbands, bracelets, necklaces, and anklets. Long swirling scarves around his shoulders and ribbons from his crown create a sense of movement.
Vajrapani, Mongolia’s Tutelary Deity
Vajrapani is one of the main deities of the Mongols, who commonly believe that Mongolia is the land of Vajrapani, Tibet is the land of , and China is the land of ; these three figures respectively represent power, compassion, and wisdom.
When Mongols reconverted to Buddhism in the sixteenth century, the Third Dalai Lama proclaimed Vajrapani as their special protector. In 1586 or 1587, he recognized Abatai Khan (1554–1588) as an emanation of Vajrapani and offered him a statue of Vajrapani indestructible by fire. Several Mongol rulers—including Chinggis Khan—were subsequently recognized as the worldly emanation of this bodhisattva.
Since the end of the eighteenth century, , the highest peak of the Khangai Range, is said to be Vajrapani’s abode in Mongolia. The mountain itself is identified with Vajrapani’s body.
After the fall of the Communist regime in 1990, Vajrapani was reinstated as the protector of the Mongolian state. In 2007 President Enkhbayar commissioned a giant appliqué depicting Vajrapani above Chinggis Khan and two of his successors, Ögedei and Qubilai (Kubilai), to be displayed on Otgontenger during ceremonial offerings to the mountain (fig. 2).
Mongol herders pray to Vajrapani to protect their livestock from thieves and wolves, to retrieve stolen or lost animals, and to protect them from gossip, harm caused by snake spirits (), and sickness.
The Bronze Workshops of Dolonnuur in Inner Mongolia
Every region of Mongolia preserved names of famous Mongol smiths, and a few were eminent sculptors, the most famous being Zanabazar, the First Khutugtu (1635–1723). Itinerant Chinese smiths also crisscrossed Mongolia to offer their services. In the eighteenth century, the growing demand for large-scale statues that required a high degree of specialization and a large workforce caused the progressive sedentarization of metalwork, as smiths established workshops in settlements. The main center of production in the early (1644–1911) was Hohhot in Inner Mongolia. After 1850, the quality and quantity of metalwork produced in Hohhot declined because commissions moved to the famous workshops of Dolonnuur.
The Vajrapani statue belongs to a set of six sculptures brought from an abandoned near Dolonnuur, Inner Mongolia, by the geographer and explorer Sven Hedin in 1930. Dolonnuur (formerly in Chakhar Province, now in Shiliin Gol League), on the southeast edge of the Mongol steppe, developed as a satellite of two large imperial monasteries, the Blue Monastery (Khökhe süme, Chinese: Huizongsi, founded in 1691 at the place where the Mongol leaders swore allegiance to Qing emperor Kangxi [r. 1661–1722] in 1691), and the Yellow Monastery (Shira süme, Chinese: Shanyinsi, founded by Emperor Yongzheng [r. 1722–1735] in 1727) (fig. 3). After 1732, when the Qing established an office to rule Inner Mongol Buddhist affairs there, Dolonnuur became a commercial and religious hub. Located on the roads from China and Tibet to Urga/Yekhe Khüriye and Central Asia, it attracted a great number of monks and pilgrims, traders, and artisans. Although the imperial monasteries encountered economic difficulties in the late Qing period, trade and metalwork continued to prosper up to the early twentieth century.
Dolonnuur’s trade and workshop center, known as Maimaicheng (a generic name for trade cities settled near large monasteries), spontaneously developed in the eighteenth century a little less than one mile (one and a half kilometers) south of the monasteries. In the late nineteenth century, it counted four thousand shops and workshops, including workshops of , carpets, and metal artifacts of daily life, and was the biggest production center for Mongol Tibetan Buddhist metal statues. The two main foundries were Ayushi Tunjan (tunjan, Chinese: tongjiang, metallurgists) and Khaisandai; the four others were Öntsög Tunjan, Öntsögön Nomtu, Bayantai Tunjan, and Khuuchin Nomtu. They employed from a hundred up to several hundred craftsmen. They were initially run by both Chinese and Mongols, and fell entirely into the hands of Chinese in the late nineteenth century.
Assimilated Chinese smiths from Dolonnuur also established bronze workshops in the Chinese settlement (Maimaicheng) east of Urga monastic city. They probably first opened branch shops to receive and assemble statues created in parts at a Dolonnuur workshop, to be assembled after delivery, and later established their own workshops. In the late nineteenth century, with twenty workshops of blacksmiths, bronze smiths, and silversmiths, Urga became the third main fabrication center for metal statues, after Dolonnuur and (fig. 4).
The purchase of large statues represented, with Buddhist scriptures, a major part of a monastery’s budget. In the nineteenth century, large-scale statues from Dolonnuur were sold for between 700 and 6,000 taels of silver, and up to 20,000 taels, at a time when the construction of an average-size monastery cost about 10,000 taels. The prices of statues made in Urga were higher than those made in Dolonnuur and Beijing.
Dolonnuur exported its production by camel caravans all over the Tibetan Buddhist world. In the nineteenth century most of the metal statues of Mongolia and the northeastern province of Tibet () came from Dolonnuur. In 1844 Fathers Huc and Gabet encountered a caravan of eighty-four camels carrying different parts of a statue to be offered to the Dalai Lama. The statue of of Urga, almost fifty feet (fifteen meters) in height and made in seven parts in Dolonnuur by twelve Chinese artists of the Ayushi Tunjan foundry, was shipped to Urga in 1833 (it was destroyed in 1939). The Buddhist temple founded in in 1913–1915 commissioned its statues from Dolonnuur foundries.
The Techniques of the Dolonnuur Foundries
As with other Dolonnuur statues, the Vajrapani statue combined the repoussémethod () for the body and the base, and the for the arms and legs, and perhaps for the head. The decorative parts, such as the crown, attributes, and scarves, were made separately from a thinner sheet by hammering and were inlaid with turquoise, coral, and lapis lazuli. The repoussé technique is less complex and uses less metal and fuel than the lost-wax technique; it permits a mass, standardized, and cheaper production, since a single mold could be used for making several sculptures. Different metal alloys were used for different parts of the body and ornaments of a single sculpture. The Dolonnuur workshops also produced a few silver statues (fig. 5).
The different parts of large statues were delivered separately; once they arrived at a temple, they were fitted together with rivets, dovetail joints, and clasps, and were gilded (using the amalgam process) and painted (they could be lacquered before the gilding).
The Style of Dolonnuur
The Chinese artisans strictly executed the will of their patrons and followed prescribed . Mongol lamas told the Russian explorer Aleksei M. Pozdneev that they preferred Dolonnuur statues to Beijing statues, because Dolonnuur craftsmen were more respectful of iconographic canons and their gilding lasted longer.
Statues at the Stockholm Ethnographical Museum and the Hermitage Museum are the rare images whose provenance is firmly attested (figs. 6 and 7). Together with photographs taken by a Japanese scholar inside the Shira süme in the 1930s (fig. 8), they allow us to distinguish a few characteristics of the Dolonnuur style: big crowns with large, flat leaves, scarves billowing behind the ears and at the elbows, long, flat ear pendants, arching eyebrows meeting above the nose, inlaid semiprecious stones, and a base plate held in place by small clamps—as seen in the Vajrapani sculpture under discussion.
Stylistic study combined with X-ray spectral analysis helps scholars define this style in spite of its many variations. It has so far been impossible to distinguish statues produced in Dolonnuur from statues made by craftsmen from Dolonnuur established in Urga (figs. 9 and 10). Besides the Urga production, hundreds of statues from China, Russia (especially Buryatia), and even Europe also imitated the Dolonnuur style.
Footnotes
1
Vesna Wallace, “How Vajrapāṇi Became a Mongol,” in Buddhism in Mongolian History, Culture, and Society, ed. Vesna Wallace (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), 179–201.
2
Isabelle Charleux, “The Making of Mongol Buddhist Art and Architecture: Artisans in Mongolia from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century,” in Meditation: The Art of Zanabazar and His School, ed. Elvira Eevr Djaltchinova-Malets (Warsaw: Asia and Pacific Museum, 2010), 59–105.
3
Isabelle Charleux, Temples et monastères de Mongolie-Intérieur (Paris: Éditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques and Institut national d’histoire de l’art (with CD-ROM, 2006), CD-ROM “Dolonnor.”
4
Regis Évariste Huc, Travels in Tartary, Tibet, and China during the Years 1844–46, trans. W. Hazlitt (London: Vizetelly, 1857), 35; Aleksei M. Pozdneev, Mongolia and the Mongols, trans. William H. Dougherty, Reprint, vol. 2 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1896-98), 977, 182–83. See Isabelle Charleux, Temples et monastères de Mongolie-Intérieur (Paris: Éditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques and Institut national d’histoire de l’art (with CD-ROM, 2006), CD-ROM “Dolonnor.”
5
Yang Pu 楊溥, Chaha’er Koubei Liu Xian Diaocha Ji 察哈爾口北六縣調查記 [Investigation of the Six Chakhar Districts North of the Passes] (Beijing: Jincheng yinshuju, 1933), 34.
6
Aleksei M. Pozdneev, Mongolia and the Mongols, trans. William H. Dougherty, Reprint, vol. 2 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1896), 179–82; Ren Yuehai 任月海, Duolun wenshi ziliao 多倫文史資料 [Dolonnuur historical documents], vol. 3 (Hohhot: Nei Menggu daxue chubanshe, 2008), 221; Hua Jueming 華覺明, Zhongguo Yezhu Shi Lunji 中國冶鑄史論集 [Essays on the History of Metallurgy in China] (Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 1986), 241 (quoted by Lan Wu, “Crafting Buddhist Art in Qing China’s Contact Zones during the Eighteenth Century,” Journal 18: A Journal of Eighteenth-Century Art and Culture 4, no. (Fall) (2017), https://www.journal18.org/issue4/crafting-buddhist-art-in-qing-chinas-contact-zones-during-the-eighteenth-century/) identifies five foundries by their Chinese names.
7
Isabelle Charleux, “The Making of Mongol Buddhist Art and Architecture: Artisans in Mongolia from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century,” in Meditation: The Art of Zanabazar and His School, ed. Elvira Eevr Djaltchinova-Malets (Warsaw: Asia and Pacific Museum, 2010), 88.
8
Isabelle Charleux, “The Making of Mongol Buddhist Art and Architecture: Artisans in Mongolia from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century,” in Meditation: The Art of Zanabazar and His School, ed. Elvira Eevr Djaltchinova-Malets (Warsaw: Asia and Pacific Museum, 2010), 88; Aleksei M. Pozdneev, Mongolia and the Mongols, trans. John Roger Shaw and Dale Plank, Reprint, vol. 1 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1896) 1971, 69. On the Buddhist workshops of Beijing, see. Gösta Montell, “The Idol Factory of Peking,” Ethnos 1, no. 4 (1954 1943): 143–56; Barbara Lipton and Nima Dorjee Ragnubs, Treasures of Tibetan Art: Collections of the Jacques Marchais Museum of Tibetan Art (Staten Island, NY: Jacques Marchais Museum of Tibetan Art, 1996), 268–71.
9
Yulia Elikhina and Victoria Demenova, “A Study of Stylistic Features and Metal Composition of the Buddhist Sculpture from Inner Mongolia (Dolonnor),” Artibus Asiae 80, no. 2 (2020): 145–66 analyzes the metal composition of fifty-three sculptures from two Russian museums. See also Gilles Béguin and Dorjiin Dashbaldan, eds., Trésors de Mongolie : XVIIe–XIXe siècles, Exhibition catalog (Paris: Réunion des musées nationaux, 1993), 159; Patricia Berger and Terese Tse Bartholomew, eds., Mongolia: The Legacy of Chinggis Khan, Exhibition catalog (London and New York: Thames and Hudson, 1995), 82.
10
Aleksei M. Pozdneev, Mongolia and the Mongols, trans. William H. Dougherty, Reprint, vol. 2 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1896-98) 1977, 179–82.
11
Some examples are: Gilles Béguin and Dorjiin Dashbaldan, eds., Trésors de Mongolie : XVIIe–XIXe siècles, Exhibition catalog (Paris: Réunion des musées nationaux, 1993), 158, ill. 4, and 159; Patricia Berger and Terese Tse Bartholomew, eds., Mongolia: The Legacy of Chinggis Khan, Exhibition catalog (London and New York: Thames and Hudson, 1995), 83, cat. no. 67, 83, 84, fig. 1, and 220; Claus Deimel and Wolf-Dietrich Freiherr Speck Sternburg, Buddhas Leuchten und Kaisers Pracht: Die Pekinger Sammlung Hermann Speck von Sternburg, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Staatliche Ethnographische Sammlungen Sachen, Grassi Museum für Völkerkunde zu Leipzig, 2008), 1:62–63 and 1:113–17; Marilyn M. Rhie and Robert A.F. Thurman, eds., A Shrine for Tibet: The Alice S. Kandell Collection (New York: Tibet House US, in association with Overlook Duckworth, 2009); Jeff Watt, “Sculpture: Dolonnor Style, Inner Mongolia,” HAR: Himalayan Art Resources, 2019, https://www.himalayanart.org/search/set.cfm?setID=4357.
Further Reading
Charleux, Isabelle. 2010b. “The Making of Mongol Buddhist Art and Architecture: Artisans in Mongolia from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century.” In Meditation: The Art of Zanabazar and His School,edited by Elvira Eevr Djaltchinova-Malets, 59–105. Warsaw: Asia and Pacific Museum.
Elikhina, Yulia, and Victoria Demenova. 2020. “A Study of Stylistic Features and Metal Composition of the Buddhist Sculpture from Inner Mongolia (Dolonnor).” Artibus Asiae 80, no. 2, 145–66.
Citation
Isabelle Charleaux, “Vajrapani: The Statuary of Dolonnuur, Inner Mongolia, and Its Impact across the Tibetan Buddhist World,” Project Himalayan Art, Rubin Museum of Art, 2023, http://rubinmuseum.org/projecthimalayanart/essays/vajrapani.
In Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism, a dharmapala is a wrathful deity who is bound to protect the Buddhist teachings and its followers. Many dharmapalas were originally non-Buddhist deities, who were adopted into the Buddhist pantheon as fierce or wrathful protectors, for instance Bektse or Mahakala. There are many dramatic stories of forced conversion, or pacification of local gods by powerful masters, such as Padmasabhava who were assimilated to become protectors.
Gilding is a metalworking technique in which a fine golden surface is applied over a statue made of bronze. In Newar metalworking workshops, gilding is typically done with fire and mercury, which gives sculptures a warm finish (but is poisonous for their makers). In Tibetan contexts sometimes gold dust is mixed with glue and applied with a brush (often called “cold gold”), especially to a deity’s face to gain merit.
Jibtsundampa, Jebtsundampa, Jetsun dampa (rje btsun dam pa) (Tibetan)
The Jibzundambas (from the Tibetan Jetsun dampa “venerable/reverend noble one”) were the most important lineage of tulkus in Khalkha Mongolia from 1639 to 1924, considered below only the Dalai Lamas and Panchen Lamas in prestige within the Geluk tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. While the Jibzundamba lineage traces its previous incarnations back to the Tibetan polymath and traveler Taranatha (1575–1634), the first formally enthroned Jibzundampa was the Mongolian prince and artist Zanabazar (1635–1723). As the Jibzundampa’s authority grew, their mobile monastery, called “the great encampment” (Mgl: yekhe khüriye), would gradually settle and develop into Mongolia’s modern capital, Ulaanbaatar. The eighth Jibzundamba ruled as khan of Mongolia from 1911 to 1924.
The Khalkha are one of the major historical subgroupings of the Mongols. Historically ruled by leaders descended from Chinggis Khan, the Khalkha inhabited a territory roughly the same as the country called Mongolia today. Other important Mongol groups after the fall of the Mongol Empire include the Chahars, who lived in what is today the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in China, the Oirat or Dzungars, who lived in Central Asia, and the Khoshut, who lived in the northern Tibetan Plateau.
The lost-wax technique is a metal casting method used in many Asian cultures. First, the sculptor shapes an image out of beeswax. Then layers of clay are applied to the wax model, from fine to coarse, creating a mold, usually in several parts. When the clay mold is heated, the clay hardens and the wax is drained out. The metalworker then pours molten metal into the empty space of the mold through the same channels the wax was poured out. When the metal has cooled and hardened, the clay mold is broken off, revealing the rough metal statue inside. This statue is often then polished, chiseled, combined with parts that were cast separately, gilded, inlaid with precious substances, and painted.
Repoussé is a metal-working technique in which an artisan hammers the back side of a sheet of metal, indenting it outward to create an image in relief on the reverse face.
Stay connected. Sign up for the Rubin Museum’s monthly newsletter to receive updates about upcoming exhibitions, programs, digital features, and more.